(20 February, 2024 - 01:41 PM)Croketas Wrote: Show More
(20 February, 2024 - 12:47 PM)paquito69 Wrote: Show More
(20 February, 2024 - 10:49 AM)Croketas Wrote: Show MoreThe VC is obviously valid lol, the other guy that got the VC didn't execute the method either, just like 99% of the people that gets a VC.
But the difference is that I'm one of the few that actually leaves an honest review instead of just a positive one because I got the method for free like everyone does.
Even though the method is not what I expected since the info I saw on the thread was misleading, I was still going to test it so I could share real results.
But OP asked me to leave a review 24h after giving me the method, so there was no way I could test the method and share real results since that would take me at least 1 week.
So basically he is the one that didn't want me to test the method and share my results, if he actually wanted that he wouldn't have asked me to leave the review 24h after.
And how its logic to take away the access to it, he basically did that because he didn't want me to actually test it so everyone could see my results, I don't know why he would want that if he is so confident that his method is working as described.
I can get a vc and not test if I want to (even though I was going to do it), read the rules monkey
Also its funny how you @MagicalKarp like the post of this guy crying because I didn't test the method when you know you are the one that asked for a review 24h after so you were obviously not expecting real results, we even talked about this on Discord already
What's the point of talking about a method you haven't worked on and don't know if it really works.
if the seller told you that he needed a fast review is to testify that at least someone "reputable" has read it and it makes sense, but you have written that you don't have time to do it, so, you shouldn't ask for a vc just to take advantage of your account and then in 6 months you start to do it or never do it as you say 99% of the people here do.
therefore it is useless to give vouch to "reputable" people since unless it is shit where they earn money fast in 20 minutes they won't do it.
the problem is all these people like you who ask for the free ebook not to do it and leave a trash review where we know the same or nothing after reading it about the method and people who really want to work on the ebook we have to buy it.
Un besito y trata de diferenciarte del resto, no hacer la misma mierda solo porque ellos lo hagan así.
Are you dumb? The point of reviewing a method that I haven't worked on is that OP literally asked for that, he wanted a quick review so thats what I left, and if you have some brain cells you can leave a review and a conclusion after reading it, you don't need to test it for that, of course if you want to get real results and more details you would need to test it and that would take at least 1 week for this method, but OP didn't want that, he just wanted a quick review.
And I just said I couldn't try it because I was busy since OP only gave me 24h and I couldn't execute it in those 24h (it was not possible to get any details in 24h anyways).
Like I don't know if you can read, you are crying because I didn't test it, I said I was going to test it, it takes AT LEAST 1 WEEK to test this method, and OP GAVE ME 24h TO LEAVE THE REVIEW, you understand?
So after 24h I left that quick review about a conclusion of this method so I could share more details and real results in like 1 week after testing it.
So stop crying about that I didn't test it since it was literally impossible to do that in 1 day.
Y que hablas de diferenciarse del resto jasdjsajdjas el resto lo único que hace es dejar una review positiva porque tienen el método de gratis y ya, soy de los únicos que en vez de eso dan una review honesta y realmente va a poner a prueba el método (aunque piense que no es tan bueno, y además no es como se especifica en el thread)
(22 February, 2024 - 01:45 PM)paquito69 Wrote: Show More
(20 February, 2024 - 01:41 PM)Croketas Wrote: Show More
Are you dumb? The point of reviewing a method that I haven't worked on is that OP literally asked for that, he wanted a quick review so thats what I left, and if you have some brain cells you can leave a review and a conclusion after reading it, you don't need to test it for that, of course if you want to get real results and more details you would need to test it and that would take at least 1 week for this method, but OP didn't want that, he just wanted a quick review.
And I just said I couldn't try it because I was busy since OP only gave me 24h and I couldn't execute it in those 24h (it was not possible to get any details in 24h anyways).
Like I don't know if you can read, you are crying because I didn't test it, I said I was going to test it, it takes AT LEAST 1 WEEK to test this method, and OP GAVE ME 24h TO LEAVE THE REVIEW, you understand?
So after 24h I left that quick review about a conclusion of this method so I could share more details and real results in like 1 week after testing it.
So stop crying about that I didn't test it since it was literally impossible to do that in 1 day.
Y que hablas de diferenciarse del resto jasdjsajdjas el resto lo único que hace es dejar una review positiva porque tienen el método de gratis y ya, soy de los únicos que en vez de eso dan una review honesta y realmente va a poner a prueba el método (aunque piense que no es tan bueno, y además no es como se especifica en el thread)
"I'm just kinda busy so couldn't try it" I don't know if you really know what you're writing but you haven't said anything about not being able to test the method because blah blah blah, you're just busy screwing your head off.
Ponle ganas a las cosas cohone que después me tengo que gastar 50 pavos en un método de mierda por reviews de mierda.
